In this clip ("Capitol Police Allow Protesters to Reach the Capitol") police can, in fact, be seen inviting protesters past the barricades:

Then police stand aside and let the Capitol be assaulted (while patriotic bystanders ask them to stop it):

Here are patriots catching on to what is going on and trying to stop the Antifa/BLM agitators themselves:

Here one can clearly see someone inside the Capitol handing weapons to those outside the Capitol so they will be able to break their way in:

Then in this clip ("Capitol police open doors for the protestors. They stand aside and invite them inside") police do… exactly what the title claims:

And this one ("Police open the doors of the capital and invite everyone in"):

And this one ("DC Capital Police Lets Protestors Enter and Storm US Capitol Building"):

Here is a policeman being "overwhelmed" with invaders. Does anything look staged about this?

And here is the famous Q Shaman with eight photojournalists. Anything here looked staged?

Here is an excellent "synch edit" showing a policeman taking careful aim and then shooting an unarmed (female) protester in the throat. She died.

Interestingly, while the identity of the policeman who shot the unarmed female protester in the throat has been guarded by the media, there are reports that this is he:

If one looks carefully in that crowd of protesters in the hallway when the female was shot, one spots this individual:

His name is John Sullivan, and he is a Utah-based Antifa/BLM activist (" Utah Man with a History of Organizing Violent Antifa, BLM Protests, Was Inside the Capitol "). He was arrested for his actions in the Capitol that day, then released without charges once his Lefty political preferences were discovered.

Does that seem odd? Not anymore.

For those with 21 minutes to spare, I suggest watching this mini-documentary:

So was the storming of the Capitol a disgrace? Yes. Was it also engineered and/or to some degree staged?

Put me down as, "Undecided". lol

On the 7 ^th of January, five minutes after the Senate had concluded its business and selected Biden to be President, DNI John Ratcliffe finally delivered his homework assignment (which had been due December 18). He opened it up with a rather dramatic and unequivocal statement: that the report from the IC community that he then oversaw inadequately reflected China’s role in affecting the US election, and notes that an accompanying Ombudsman’s report highlights the worst sin of which intelligence analysts can be accused: politicizing the intelligence product. DNI Ratcliffe’s letter (which the MSM has already flushed down the Orwellian Memory Hole) is so shocking I am going to quote the first 50% of it:

Ratcliffe – Views on Intelligence Community Election Security Analysis